The Dry Eye Zone

Rebecca's Blog


Abstract: Corneal epithelial opacity in dry eye

Interesting to see "dysfunctional tear syndrome" starting to creep into the medical literature in place of "dry eye" now and then.

Corneal Epithelial Opacity in Dysfunctional Tear Syndrome.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun 20. [Epub ahead of print]
Chen JJ, Rao K, Pflugfelder SC.
Ocular Surface Center, Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

PURPOSE: To compare the appearance of the superficial corneal epithelium in patients with dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS) and that of an asymptomatic control group using laser scanning confocal microscopy and to determine the correlations between confocal microscopic findings and clinical severity parameters. DESIGN: Prospective case-control study.

METHODS: Thirty-one patients with newly diagnosed DTS and 21 asymptomatic control subjects were evaluated for this study. Subjects with DTS were classified into 4 levels of clinical severity (DTS 1 through 4) based on the Delphi dry eye panel report criteria. The Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 2 Rostock Cornea Module (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) laser scanning confocal microscope was used to image the superficial corneal epithelium. Areas of single or multiple opaque superficial epithelial cells were measured as a percentage of the 400 x 400-mum(2) field area in 4 randomly selected confocal images from each eye. Spearman correlations between the confocal findings and severity of symptoms, visual acuity, and ocular surface signs were calculated.

RESULTS: The mean area of opaque superficial corneal epithelial cells was significantly greater in DTS patients than in normal subjects (P < .0001). Significant differences were observed between the DTS severity groups and the control group (P < .001), except for the DTS 1 group. The area of opaque cells significantly increased with level of clinical severity. The confocal findings showed significant correlation with clinical severity parameters, including blurred vision symptoms (r = 0.86; P = .0001), best-corrected visual acuity (Spearman r = 0.4; P = .03), conjunctival lissamine green staining scores (Spearman r = 0.4; P = .026), corneal fluorescein staining scores (Spearman r = 0.5; P = .002), and videokeratoscopic surface regularity index (Spearman r = 0.5; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS: Morphologic changes in the superficial corneal epithelium of DTS patients detected by laser scanning confocal microscopy correlates with blurred vision symptoms and objective severity parameters. Objective confocal image analysis of the superficial corneal epithelium may prove useful for classifying DTS severity and for monitoring the efficacy of therapies.